The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012

The line graph provides information about changes of crime in Burglary, Car Theft and Robbery in Manchester City Centre in over the period of 10 years, starting 2003.
Looking at the line chart it's immediately obvious that crime in Burglary and Robbery experienced a downward trend, with the exception in Car Theft. Also, the amount of crime in Robbery was always lowest in the period between 2003 and 2012.
It can be see from the graph that in 2003 ,the amount of crime in Burglary was the highest, as about 3400 crime per year. The figure for crime in Car Theft was lower, at under 2300 crime per year. However, the Crime in Robbery accounted for a lowest number with only over 500 crime per year.
In the period from 2003 to 2012, after many minor fluctuations, the figure for crime in Robbery turned back to around over 500 crime per year in 2012. By contrast, the amount of crime in Car Theft had a trend to increase significantly and reached the peak approximately 2800 in 2012. In the other hand, Burglary registered a considerable decline of crime in the same of period, it dropped to a dip about over 1000 in 2008 and then there was a slight rise in following 4 years, at about under 1500 in 2012.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t can be see from the graph that in 2003 ,the amount of crime in Burglary was the...
^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... graph that in 2003 ,the amount of crime in Burglary was the highest, as about 34...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ver, the Crime in Robbery accounted for a lowest number with only over 500 crime ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50454545455 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39021334502 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4342628859 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239603043562 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116772911225 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572446143084 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165802102331 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349215220051 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.