The chart illustrates how many visitors came to British Museum, Science Museum, National History Museum from June to September 2003.
Looking in the graph, it's immediately to obvious that overall, British Museum registered the highest visitors. The figures for visitors to British Museum and Science Museum experienced an upward trend, while exception with visitors to Nation History Museum.
It can be seen from the graph that in June, a number of visitors to British Museum was the highest, at exactly 600,000 people per month. The figures for visitors to National History Museum accounted for a lower number, at around 570,000 people per month. However, visitors to Science Museum was the lowest number, with only about 400,000 people per month.
In the period over 3 months, starting in June, The Visitor to Science Museum had a trend to decrease slightly to 300,000 from June to August, then it increased significantly to around 450,000 people per month in September. A similarly, visitors to British Museum after the fluctuation on June and August, The figures went up to 650,000 person per month. Opposite trend was witnessed in Natural History Museum, after some minor fluctuations, it registered around 470,000 visitors per month.
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 67
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... September 2003. Looking in the graph, its immediately to obvious that overall, Br...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30808080808 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54938469242 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1331023168 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23055664922 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127775792287 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043347645323 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170918962294 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299736139111 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.