The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003-2012.

The line graph elucidates various trends in three criminal activities namely: burglary, car theft and robbery in new metro cities which were measured in numbers between the years 2003 and 2012.
In general, it is clear that robbery and car theft rates were fluctuated in the given period, whereas the crime of burglary declined gradually in the urban centres.
According to the graph, burglary crime accounted for approximately 3400 incidents in 2003 then reached a peak at around 3600 in 2004. Following that, in the next 4 years, it was dramatically fell down, just below 1200 cases in 2008. By 2009, the figures for burglary rose to 1500 then hovered at the end of the period.
In 2003, the number of incidents of car theft made up 2700 cases, whereas robbery theft in person experienced 700 cases. Similarly, from the next 2 years car stolen showed a steady then sharply declined in 2006 around 2800 and 2000, respectively. In contrast, robbery theft rose to 900 incidents in the year 2005 then witnessed a fluctuation over the whole period of time. In the year 2012, it is notable that the figures for robberies were 700 incidents, which was similar to 2003.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-11 Đặng Luân 93 view
2022-03-31 Aditow Zahid 73 view
2022-02-02 diamondngtkc 61 view
2021-12-21 nganphuong05 79 view
2021-11-06 Vuthungan 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... witnessed a fluctuation over the whole period of time. In the year 2012, it is notable that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, then, whereas, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.835 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51733490025 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1590899881 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113772531213 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467180666135 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354325259044 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069333495302 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302872842709 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.