The given graph illustrates the number of incidents caused by three types of crime in Panama City between 2010 and 2019.
As can be seen from the graph, the quantity crime incidents decreased considerably in the period of nine years. Another noticeable point is that the figure in the burglary line witnessed the most dramatic change.
From 2010 to 2015, the number of crimes led by burglary increased moderately by 200 before falling down steeply from 3700 to 1000. Meanwhile, the figure in both car theft and robbery lines stayed unchanged in the first two years. In 2012, while a notable fall of about 1000 was recorded in the number of car theft incidents, the figure for robbery crimes fluctuated slightly in the next three years.
From 2015 onwards, there were only small changes in the quantity of incidents caused by all three different areas of crime. The numbers of burglary and car theft crimes grew unremarkably by 500 and 700 respectively. By contrast, the figure in the robbery line stayed the same in the next four years.
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 67
- Free time activities of the elderly in The United States from 1980 to the present 73
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both of views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84269662921 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45579527609 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.378699466 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158605494315 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693875186786 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722938289806 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112913710734 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572033456722 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.