The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012 .

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012 .

This graph illustrates how crime rates altered in Newport inner city during the period 2003 - 2012 . We can see immediately that the greatest change occurred in the number of burglaries, while incidents of remained low but steady.
In 2003 , we can see that burglary was the most common crime, with approximately 3,400 reported cases.the figure rose to around 3,700 in 2004 , but then there was a downward trend until 2008 . At this point the figure stood at just over 1,000 incidents. This rose slightly in 2009, then continued to fluctuate for the remaining period .
In 2003 , the number of cars being stolen stood at around 2,800 and followed a similar trend to burglary until 2006 . At this point the number rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There was a marginal decrease in the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upwards.
Finally, robbery has always been a fairly minor problem for Newport. The number of offences committed changed little over nine year. It is interesting to note that the figure of approximately 700 in 2003 is the same figure for 2012 .

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-15 Gurjant singh2 78 view
2018-08-15 Gurjant singh2 78 view
2018-08-15 Gurjant singh2 56 view
Essays by user Gurjant singh2 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...inner city during the period 2003 - 2012 . We can see immediately that the greates...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iately that the greatest change occurred in the number of burglaries, while inci...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e occurred in the number of burglaries, while incidents of remained low but stea...
^^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts of remained low but steady. In 2003 , we can see that burglary was the most c...
^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that burglary was the most common crime, with approximately 3,400 reported cases....
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
....the figure rose to around 3,700 in 2004 , but then there was a downward trend unt...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...en there was a downward trend until 2008 . At this point the figure stood at just ...
^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed to fluctuate for the remaining period . In 2003 , the number of cars being sto...
^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uate for the remaining period . In 2003 , the number of cars being stolen stood a...
^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d a similar trend to burglary until 2006 . At this point the number rose, standin...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il 2006 . At this point the number rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There was a marginal decrease in the fo...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...marginal decrease in the following year, but from then on, the trend was general...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upwards. Final...
^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trend was generally upwards. Finally, robbery has always been a fairly minor p...
^^
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to note that the figure of approximately 700 in 2003 is the same figure for 2012 ...
^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 700 in 2003 is the same figure for 2012 .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87027027027 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50863072998 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3188185086 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122418404866 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478530337944 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054216683621 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848316869002 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549145300245 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.