The chart below shows the changes that took places in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012
The line chart illustrates data on the number of incidents made by three kinds of crime in Newport city between 2003 and 2012. Overall, the number of burglary cases in this city dropped significantly, while car theft and robbery remained relatively constant throughout 9 years.
In the 2003-2006 period, although burglary experienced a sharp decline in the number of incidents, its rate always remained above the rate of other crime. Over nine years, Newport city saw a marked fall in the number of burglary with the notable exception of 2004 when it reached the highest point of the whole line graph at around 3800 incidents. After that, there was a gradual decline in the rates of burglary, which fell to the lowest point (about 1100 incidents) by the year 2008. This figure fluctuated slightly in the next 4 years before went down to almost 1500 cases in 2012.
Over the same period, the rates of car theft and robbery varied less significantly than that of burglary. From 2003, car theft remained steady before reaching the bottom at about 2000 cases in 2006. The rate of this crime climbed up steeply throughout the remaining period and in 2012, it nearly owned a similar rate of crime as it used to be in 2003 (almost 3000 cases). Likewise, Newport also saw a similar figure for robbery in 2003 and 2012 (about 600 incidents). Although Robbery rate stayed unchanged in 9 years, it reached the low point of incidents at 500 cases in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | Hung@vietnam | view | |
| 2021-10-19 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | deeparsh | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | Gagandhillon | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-24 | Pattrick Jane | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took places in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 84
- the charts below shows the annual number of rentals and rentals and sales (in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75298804781 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4154862977 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0804773155 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163412398691 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708029281955 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081013624757 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132162653658 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546906383616 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.