the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The graphical compares three countries among 2007 and 2010 on the growth of GDP per year. On the whole, percentage of every season there was escalation and regression from each states.
In tunisia, sequentially start from 2007 to 2010 this country had progress that goes down and stands in place, stood at 6.3%, 4.4%, 3.1% at the same time. In japan, instead the opposite which got periodic enhancement from 2%, 4.05%, 5.2%, the last 6.5%. In ecuador, there was uncertain of uplifted or declined and finish at 3.1%, 4.9%, 1.2%, and 2.2%.
The inference of Gross Domestic Product in tunisia, japan and Equador from 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. there was advanced and stuck in tunisia. Therefore, found the periodically increased obtained by japan, that is fantastic steped-up. Lastly, the erratic derivation and was climbed for ecuador, the inequality experienced is also very far away. So, from these charts, severally country can learn from its impression.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | fadhiahelbas | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | sandhu12 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | sandhu12 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Thang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-23 | emat18 | 67 | view |
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in japan and malaysia in this year. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 56
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The climograph below shows the average monthly temperatures and rainfall the city of Kolkata.The Pie Charts below show the comparison if different kinds of energy production of Frqnce in two year. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nt from 2%, 4.05%, 5.2%, the last 6.5%. In ecuador, there was uncertain of uplifte...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...quador from 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010. there was advanced and stuck in tunisia. Ther...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, therefore, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1858974359 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53018431658 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705128205128 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1854740624 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123744136265 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491335945622 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851925343105 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996900623232 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649016559227 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.