The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The given report aims to compare the number of worldwide sales of the five leading mobile phone developers namely, Samsung, Apple, Nokia, LG and ZTE from 2009 to 2013 in form of the bar chart.
Generally speaking, three out of five companies followed upward trends over the period with the massive growth of Samsung in particular, whereas the other two experienced downward trends with a dramatic decrease in Nokia.
In 2009, the totals of units sold by Samsung valued approximately 215 million dollars, half the value of the product sold by Nokia. However, Samsung started to increase significantly in 2009 and climbed up to an estimated $430 million by 2013. While Samsung experienced such a dramatic increase in its sales units, Nokia, by contrast, faced a drastic drop from over $400 million to only $250 million within 5 years.
Focusing on three remaining brands, Apple and ZTE’s product sale units tended to increase when those of LG slightly decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- Print media including magazines and newspapers will soon be completely replaced by internet news sources To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06289308176 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58685598737 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2343387014 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152680221323 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770446838578 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811362903207 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960528203601 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919827938219 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.