The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart gives information about how often Americans consumed fast food in restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the proportion of people who ate fast food in their daily meals accounted for the lowest. In both 2003 and 2006, most US people ate once a week, while it changed in 2013 when people ate once or twice a week.
In 2003 and 2006, the number of people who consumed fast food once a week accounted for over 30%, while the proportion of consumption had a slight decrease to around 27%. Eating once or twice a week, 5% of people ate fast food more in 2013 than in 2006. But in the last period, the figure significantly rose to over 33% which was the highest number on the chart.
The proportion of people who had fast food as a meal several times a year was in-between 13%-15%. Daily eaters and those who never ate in fast food establishments before made up for very small percentages, between 3% and 5%. After fluctuating, the proportion of people who ate several a year had a reduction of nearly 5%.
- 21 5 2016 In develpoping countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved ny providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing compute 50
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the rate of violent crime in society Do you agree or diagree 61
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 67
- Test 4 Cam 12 The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 70
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48924731183 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50586662792 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9912535503 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367501537097 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167582012489 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772258456735 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246413250245 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476432264325 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.