The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people who eating fast food in restaurants in six distinct groups in the United States from 2003 and 2013.
In general, the people who went to restaurants to eat fast food in once a week and once or twice a week have heights frequency among all other groups, while those eating fast food in restaurants daily and never have smallest proportion in the United States between 2003 and 2013.
As can be seen, people who eating fast food for once a week has largest frequency in both 2003 and 2006 around by 31 and 33 percent and after that decrease about 27 percent in 2013. Those used restaurants once or twice a month first dropped from 30 percent to 25 percent between 2003 and 2006. After that increased more than 33 percent in 2013 which was the largest category this year. The percentage of group ‘several times a week’ fluctuated varied 16 percent and 20 percent in all these years. While the proportion of people who eating fast food a few times a year raised approximately from 13 percent to 15 percent over the period. Two remain groups that include those daily use the restaurants and never eating fast food in restaurants each category no more than 5 percent of people.
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is positive or negative development 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the smallest'.
Suggestion: have the smallest
...ast food in restaurants daily and never have smallest proportion in the United States between...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the largest'.
Suggestion: has the largest
...le who eating fast food for once a week has largest frequency in both 2003 and 2006 around ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt to 25 percent between 2003 and 2006. After that increased more than 33 percent in ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cent and 20 percent in all these years. While the proportion of people who eating fas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64220183486 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42278275399 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48623853211 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7905101272 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185338079079 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977648277599 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651810609821 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168296016349 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379968289882 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.