The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar graph illustrates the change of the frequency of eating at fast food in America over period of 10 years.
It is clear that eating fast food once a week and once or twice a month accounted the highest percentage in the USA. There were not many people who ate fast food every day or never ate in fast food restaurants.
According to the bat chart, the number of people who eating fast food in restaurant once a week occupied for the highest percentage, which increased from 31% in 2003 to 34% in 2006 but decreased from 28% in 2013. Similarly, the percentage of people who chose to eat fast food in several times a week was in the same trend. the percentage increased from 17% in 2003 to 20% in 2006 and then decreased from 16% in 2013. In contrast, the frequency of once or twice a month showed an opposite trend. There was a downward trend from 30% in 2003 to 25% in 2006 and increased from 33% in 2013.
The tendency in choosing everyday and never eat fast food in restaurant were same. There were 4% of people in 2003 to choose eat every day and then keep stablely in 2006 and 2013, which accounted in 3%. There were 5% of people never eat fast food in restaurant in 2003, and drop 1% of people in 2006 and 2003. However, the trend of a few times a year in the opposite way. There are 13% of people choose in 2003, the number of people increased from 15% in 2006 and remain stable in 2013.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 89
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ral times a week was in the same trend. the percentage increased from 17% in 2003 t...
^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...3% in 2013. The tendency in choosing everyday and never eat fast food in restaurant w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to eat'
Suggestion: to eat
...ere were 4% of people in 2003 to choose eat every day and then keep stablely in 200...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25746268657 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25838145852 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402985074627 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.693416322 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7692307692 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229596357892 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100495091727 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635195347239 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147537872558 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551793041797 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.1 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.