the chart below shows how frequently people in USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The given bar chart illustrates how is the frequency of USA citizen having meals at fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
It can be clear that the proportion people in USA eating fast food once a week and once or twice a month makes up the most while the percentage of people eating this kind of food everyday take account for the lest.
In 2003, the number of individuals having meals with fast food once a week peaked with about 31 % and that of people did once or twice a month hit the top with 30%. Besides, there was beneath 5% of people eating fast food everyday which hit the bottom. In the 2006, the figure of individuals eating fast food once a week grew up slightly to about 33% while that of ones did everyday decreased modestly to about 2%. In 2013, the figure of people having fast food once or twice a month reached a peak with about 33% whereas that of ones did daily was at the bottom with 2%. The number of people never eating fast food in 2006 and 2013 were at the same scale with 4%.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mke comparisons where relevant. 11
- The youngsters outweigh the elders 84
- Many goverments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The maps 11
- The diagram below shows how geotherml energy is used to produce electricity 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s beneath 5% of people eating fast food everyday which hit the bottom. In the 2006, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...tly to about 33% while that of ones did everyday decreased modestly to about 2%. In 2013...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23316062176 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03915988236 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5274681656 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271532073592 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159625807699 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861028914893 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228312452402 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890713729395 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.