The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There is a bar chart which shows how often the number of people of USA ate fast food for the years 2003,2006 and 2013. The number of people is measured in percentage.
To start with the percentage of people who ate fast food everyday and never for all the three years were almost same by 1% difference which was more in never category. People who ate everyday and never were in less than 5%. Starting with 2003, approx 16% people ate fast food several times a week, 30% once a week and once or twice a month and 13% few times a year.
In 2006, a good amount which was around 33% people ate fast food once a week and the same percentage of people in 2013 ate twice a month. There was a difference of 3 % between 2006 and 2013 in the case of people eating once a week and once a month . Exact 20 % people ate lot of times a week in 2006 in contrast to almost 16 % in 2013. Perfectly same number of public (15%) enjoyed fast food a few times a year in both 2006 and 2013.
Overall, it was sad to see that still around 3 to 4 % people ate fast food almost every day in all the three years and very less percentage of people who completely ignored it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | binh01012000 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Jenil | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls In the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 77
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 84
- Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree. Do you agree or disagree ? 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... percentage of people who ate fast food everyday and never for all the three years were ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... more in never category. People who ate everyday and never were in less than 5%. Startin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wice a month and 13% few times a year. In 2006, a good amount which was around ...
^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ople eating once a week and once a month . Exact 20 % people ate lot of times a we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, in contrast, in contrast to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.11555555556 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07020450484 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3540808144 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241292378732 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123760891478 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760969502086 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180286089486 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705716527948 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.91 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.92 8.06136585366 73% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.