The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the frequency of people in USA eating in fast food restaurants in the period of time from 2003 to 2013.
It can be seen that the proportion of consuming fast food in restaurants once or twice a month in 2003 is the highest one over the period of time.
Firstly, the highest rate of eating in fast food restaurants among people in USA in 2003 peaked at more than 30%, which is the percentage of people who consumed once a week. The proportion in 2003 increased rapidly from nearly 5% (with people who ate every day) to 31%(with people ate once a week). Furthermore, this trend had a slow decrease in the rate of eating once or twice a week and a rapid depression in the percentage of eating a few times a year and never. In 2006, the proportion of people who ate this consumption in restaurants had a vast difference between group included people who ate every day (3%) and once a week (33%). This tendency in 2006 had the same trend with the one in 2003. However, there was a merely high 3%.
In 2013, the figures of the American eating in fast food restaurants reached the highest percentage at 33% with the citizens who had frequency of once or twice a month. To be specific, the rate of people eating every day and never was generally 4%.
In conclusion, it's clear to see that the frequency of eating in fast food restaurants among people in the USA from 2003 to 2013 reached the highest rate with the American who ate once or twice a month.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | binh01012000 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Jenil | 56 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays, young people admire sports stars although they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefit 56
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... eating in fast food restaurants in the period of time from 2003 to 2013. It can be seen tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nth in 2003 is the highest one over the period of time. Firstly, the highest rate of eating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...entage of eating a few times a year and never. In 2006, the proportion of people who ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic, the rate of people eating every day and never was generally 4%. In conclus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38827838828 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47598997823 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.391941391941 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8690848105 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.909090909 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219638288951 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107058155418 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818646472884 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167607743403 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625888590972 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.