the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Information on how the frequency of eating fast food changed during a decade in the US is provided in the bar chart. Overall figures declined in the period.
As regards eating several times a week and once a week, figures rose and dropped. The former was around 17 percent and peaked at 20 percent in 2006. Then, it decreased slightly, reaching a low of about 16 percent. The latter grew moderately, with nearly 33 percent eating fast food in 2006. Subsequently, it fell by nearly 5 percent in 2013. By contrast, the percentage of people who ate once or twice a month declined by 5 percent in 2006 and went up considerably to about 33 percent in 2013.
The percentage of people who ate fast food rarely was 12 percent and levelled off at 15 percent while for people who ate every day and who never ate the pattern is reversed. Levels declined gradually by approximately 2 percent in 2006 and remained constant.
To sum up, it can be inferred that as the public awareness about this type of food increased, people tended to consume fast food less frequently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, as regards, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69312169312 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63269917618 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4530854333 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6363636364 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131038486311 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474687442022 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597662447719 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997626042256 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383127526709 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.