The chart below shows how people in one European city came to the office and returned home between 1959 and 2009 Summarize information by selecting and reporting key features and comparing if relevant

The two pie charts, one titled 1959 and the other 2009, give the percentage of people using various means of transportation to commute to work in one European city. There are four specific categories of transportation: walking, bus, car, and train. There is a fifth category labeled "other." In addition, below each chart is information on the average distance of the trip and average time to commute.

Overall, in 1959, the majority of people walked to and from their office, but in 2009 they either walked or drove, the largest proportion being those who commuted by car. Moreover, the average distance increased by more than a factor of five, and the average commute time more than doubled.

In detail, in 1959, 30% commuted by public transportation and 55% walked to work. Only one in ten used a car. This contrasts with 2009, where the percentage of those going by car was 35%, the largest category. About the same percentage (28%) used public transportation, but only a quarter walked. The commute distance had grown from 3.5 km in 1959 to 19 km in 2009, and the commute time had also increased from 17 to 42 minutes.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...f those going by car was 35 the largest category About the same percentage 28 used publi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ransportation but only a quarter walked The commute distance had grown from 35 km in 1959 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...from 35 km in 1959 to 19 km in 2009 and the commute time had also increased from 17 to 42 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6358974359 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6631337544 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 195.0 22.4926829268 867% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 904.0 112.824112599 801% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 195.0 22.9334400587 850% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 40.0 5.23603664747 764% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138158321679 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138158321679 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104949445201 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584005365927 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 97.9 13.2329268293 740% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -117.99 61.2550243902 -193% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 78.2 10.3012195122 759% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.9 8.06136585366 197% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.0 10.9970731707 727% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.