The table offers information about how unemployed in the UK spend their time in 1982. The data are segmented by time band and gender and shown in relative values.
Overall, there is a remarkable higher share of women that spent their time doing housework; however, spending time in the garden is a predominantly male activity. Entertainment occupations like watching TV or visiting friends are prone to be done in the afternoon. There is a trend of doing a more productive task like looking for a job, doing housework or going shopping in the morning.
The chart shows a clear distribution in the house related activities. Housework is widely done by women, doubling the figures of men in the morning and reaching triple times the time spent by men in the afternoon, with 21% and 7% respectively. On the other hand, gardening is a man predominant task, 14% in both time frames by just 2% in the morning and a 3% in the afternoon spent by its female counterpart.
In both female and male distribution of time expenditure changes along with the time band. There is a tendency in staying in bed in the morning, 8% for both genders, and to watch TV in the afternoon 14% and 12%.
- The chart below shows how the UK unemployed spent their time in the year 1982 65
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for examples working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Too much attention is paid to and too much money is spent on keeping pets, while people throughout the world are starvingDiscuss the arguments for and again keeping petsTo what extent do you agree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 89
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.Describe the advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70192307692 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81499314218 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5945351111 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262670059755 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101195054445 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107048043493 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157682533736 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947226428072 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.