The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart compares percentage change in average accommodation prices in five various cities over a period of 12 years compared with average house prices in 1989.
It is clear that London experienced dramatical increase in average house prices in these years. It is also noticeable that the majority of these five cities rose their average accommodation prices.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that New York citizens purchased houses in 1990-1995 by 5% less than in 1989. Furthermore, average prices of houses decreased by 7.5% compared with 1989, also the same pattern can be seen in Tokyo. By contrast, population of Madrid bought houses about 2% more than in 1989, while the percentage of average house prices in Frankfurt just above the 2%.
It can also be seen that the figure for average house prices in London saw an significant increase in 1996-2002, at 19.5%. However,the proportion of average accommodation prices rose by approximately 10% in 1996-2002 compared with 1990-1995, while this figure increased slightly in Tokyo, at 2.5%. Moreover, the percentage of average house prices remained relatively stable in Frankfurt in 1996-2002, whereas in Madrid households purchased houses by 4% in 1996-2002 more than in 1989.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 73
- The charts below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart compares percentage change...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed with average house prices in 1989. It is clear that London experienced dram...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se their average accommodation prices. Looking at the information in more detai...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prices in Frankfurt just above the 2%. It can also be seen that the figure for ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... for average house prices in London saw an significant increase in 1996-2002, at 1...
^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...increase in 1996-2002, at 19.5%. However,the proportion of average accommodation pri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23762376238 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85218981942 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5650490303 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5407016763 0.215688989381 251% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251196478654 0.103423049105 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11015839675 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365939689695 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982051140154 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.