The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart compares the cost of an average house in five major cities over a period of 13
years from 1989.
We can see that house prices fell overall between 1990 and 1995, but most of the cities saw
rising prices between 1996 and 2002. London experienced by far the greatest changes in
house prices over the 13-year period.
Over the 5 years after 1989, the cost of average homes in Tokyo and London dropped by
around 7%, while New York house prices went down by 5%. By contrast, prices rose by
approximately 2% in both Madrid and Frankfurt.
Between 1996 and 2002, London house prices jumped to around 12% above the 1989
average. Homebuyers in New York also had to pay significantly more, with prices rising to
5% above the 1989 average, but homes in Tokyo remained cheaper than they were in 1989.
The cost of an average home in Madrid rose by a further 2%, while prices in Frankfurt
remained stable.
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developingand industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68902439024 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20170928947 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4212402016 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426848078543 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190019424641 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768193885818 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1578714675 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834154825926 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.