The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007

The chart illustrates the number of trips made by men and women belonging to a European country in the year 2007. It also mentions the reasons associated with travel.

Overall, In both the genders the statistics were almost similar expect for the last two reasons which has a huge difference. The highest number of trips made by men is accounted for travelling to work, while the highest figure of trips by women is accounted for shopping.

Firstly, The number of trips made by men were higher in all of the reasons with an exception of friends and shopping. Travelling to work accounted for the highest number of trips, at 330. The reason which men used to least is day trips with a number less than 50. Visiting friends and shopping were the only 2
reasons where the statistics of women over took them.

On the other hand, Women made the highest trips in shopping in contrary to the other reasons, with over 260. The purposes visiting friends and travelling to work had similar numbers. However, the least used reason for trip was associated with day trip, less than 30.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ber of trips made by men were higher in all of the reasons with an exception of friends an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing friends and shopping were the only 2 reasons where the statistics of women ov...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37304978947 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465608465608 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9422400242 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299054143849 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129653082376 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152356981664 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189492800617 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12342429397 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.