The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011, and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below demonstrates the number of families by their yearly income in the USA in three years: 2007, 2011, and 2015. Overall, their earnings have increased for three years, and the majority of households came from those who earned $100.000 and more per year. Families who had earnings less than $25.000 and up to $49.999 also made up a significant figure, while only slight changes were in the annual income of $50.000 to $99.999 households.
Most households came from those who earned $100.000 and more per year. In fact, nearly 30 million households gained from $100.000 to more in 2007. In 2011, however, this figure slightly decreased and grew again to nearly 35 million. The second largest families of five groups of households by income were $25.000 to $49.999 per year. They represented slightly more than 25 million households in 2007 and took the lead in five groups with 30 million households in 2011. They slightly declined in 2015. Families who had been paid less than $25.000 were the third largest group. Their number was approximately equal to those from families making $25.000 to $49.999 a year.
The number of households earning $50.000 to $74.999 did not change at all in three years: 2007, 2011, and 2015. Their figure steadily stayed at about 20 million families. The smallest group was families who made $75.000 to $99.999 a year. They represented just around 15 million households in all three years: 2007, 2011, and 2015.
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 81
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84016393443 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3212320249 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450819672131 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5655263797 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7333333333 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178091417668 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799082950861 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744402931683 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145931879432 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181286052976 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.