The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the number of US households according to five groups of yearly income in three different years.
It is clear that the annual income of families living in the US changed significantly in 2007, 2011, and 2015. While households that had the highest and lowest salaries changed considerably, the number of households having the average income was relatively stable.
In 2007, the number of US families having yearly income less than $25000 stood at 25 millions, over the following 4 four years, this figure increased to around 28 millions before falling slightly to 26 millions. A similar trend was also saw in the group of families with income from $25000 to less than $50000, at 27 millions, 30 millions and 28 millions respectively.
Looking at the group of households that had the highest income ($100000 or more), in 2007 the figure was 29 millions then fell by around 2 millions and eventually increased dramatically to 33 millions in 2015. By contrast, the number of US households earning an annual income from $50000 to under $100000 was relatively stable, fluctuating between 15 and 20 millions throughout the period shown.
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...o 26 millions. A similar trend was also saw in the group of families with income fr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97382198953 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72314732846 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.3216919502 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206723373231 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121127578318 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656591393207 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150964067044 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602984088129 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.