The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart aims to display the amounts of male and female students in thousands attending full- or part-time further education grades in the United Kingdom in three different lapses of time, 1970-71, 1980-81 and 1990-91. Overall, the data show an increase in women's attendances while the numbers of men attending further education levels fluctuated over the frame period.
In detail, the graphic shows that within the first period, 1970-1971, the number of male students, accounting 1000 thousand people, exceeded the rate of women by about 2500 people; nonetheless, the gap gradually decreased in 1980-1981 and finally the trend reversed in 1990-1991 when female students overtook the opposite class by 1000 thousand enrolments.
Furthermore, the data reporting the amounts of part- and full-time students mirrored each other: in 1970-71, only 100 and 50 thousand male and female students respectively chose a part-time subscription against the 1000 and 750 thousand of full-time enrolled. Even though the trend steadily increased up to 280 for both categories, the number of full-time students accounted for more than 4 times part-time women and 3 times part-time men.
In conclusion, while British universities and post-education courses saw an increase in the number of female students, both male and female groups preferred a full-time solution over the mentioned period.
- Some people think that tourism benefits the host country Others think that tourism causes problems for the host country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 79
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 84
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Comments
Dear Reader
Dear Reader
thank you for your reply.
I would like to know how I could improve the flesch_reading index?
Any suggestions?
Thank you
It is fine for one attribute
It is fine for one attribute that is low. You may take it serious if flesch_reading index is low again in another essay.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53301886792 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82925692209 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3695462292 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.5 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3333333333 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303990144696 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167365519493 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674241947724 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180144176681 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934130736492 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.