Well, there are plenty of ways that an individual can find a job such as by eye-catching advertisements on newspapers, websites that provide jobs for instance, Indeed, Ebay and many more. There are very premium quality websites which have been used by thousands of people looking for jobs. Rather than that, a candidate can get approved for a job by being personally suggested by a friend or a family member. I personally think that job offers available on the internet are a better option.
First of them all, getting a job by the suggestion of your closed one is the most finest option among the others because it does not take much effort and it is the most convenient way to find what you are looking for. But there is a downside as well, the person who helped you getting that job could act arrogantly with you and would make you feel like you owe them and you are going to have to owe them back. Which may lead to conflicts between friend and families.
Other way around, receiving a job offer from web sites as mentioned above is also an adequate way. Internet is helping people to reach their dream jobs and it even makes sure if you are eligible for the job. It is good option if you know that you are capable enough. I myself would pick a job on the internet instead of getting it with the help of someone. But it has disadvantages too like only the deserving ones get the job not everyone with social status. Newspaper is a thing of the past. It is not something that s youngster would read to look for employment. people do not read them anymore for these purposes.
To conclude, there are a whole lot of ways to get the job that you dream of from newspapers to websites. But the most preferred way among them according to me is by looking on websites.
- It is suggested that all the young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people 56
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 61
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'finest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: finest
...he suggestion of your closed one is the most finest option among the others because it does...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the finest'.
Suggestion: most the finest
...he suggestion of your closed one is the most finest option among the others because it does...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to get' or 'get'.
Suggestion: to get; get
...side as well, the person who helped you getting that job could act arrogantly with you ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ster would read to look for employment. people do not read them anymore for these purp...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...e purposes. To conclude, there are a whole lot of ways to get the job that you dream o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, well, for instance, such as, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43119266055 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43174459528 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7912597769 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2352941176 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360740917802 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112598640263 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847527091192 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225802995395 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351197792385 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 12.4159519038 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.