The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the number of visitors going to the three airports in New York City from 1995.
It is clear that The number of visitors in Laguardia airports is higher than the others’ in every year.While John F. Kennedy’s figures fluctuated, those of Laguardia and Newark increased gradually
In 1995, Laguardia had the most visitors, at 35 millions. The John F. Kennedy came to the second with 28 millions people visiting. The users of Newark were smallest, two times lower than that of Laguardia.
In 1997, John F. Kenedy witnessed an two-fold increase in the number of visitors (45 millions), surpassing the 42 millions of Laguardia. Newark’s figure was still lowest at, 39 millions. However, Laguardia’s numbers soared and reached the peak of 69 millions in 2000. Some fluctuations could be observed in John F. Kenedy’s passengers, which fell in 1998 and 1999 and finally increased again to 40. Additionally, Newark’s figures remained stable at 42 millions from 1998 onwards.
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? 61
- It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- The number of people working online from home has grown in some countries What advantages and disadvantages can come of this trend 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chart illustrates the number of visitors going to the three airports in New York ...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...her than the others' in every year.While John F. Kennedy's figures fluctua...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han the others' in every year.While John F. Kennedy's figures fluctuate...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...a. In 1997, John F. Kenedy witnessed an two-fold increase in the number of visi...
^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '42 million'.
Suggestion: 42 million
...of visitors 45 millions, surpassing the 42 millions of Laguardia. Newark's figure was s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... millions, surpassing the 42 millions of Laguardia. Newark's figure was sti...
^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 40. Additionally, Newark's figures remained stable at 42 millions from 1998...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35802469136 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13093819284 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4695376297 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7692307692 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4615384615 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133702799512 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049245647817 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107045000342 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131170585731 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158417251819 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.92 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.