The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart delineates that how the children travelled from one country to another via using various modes of transport. The graph illustrates the data for the children between the age 5 and 12 in the year 1990 and 2010.

Overall, car passenger amount has almost doubled over the period. On the contrary, walking and bus utilization almost dropped to half over the years.

In regards with the year 1990, roughly 4. 5 million students used car that was recorded as the least among the other modes of the transport. However, almost similar number(6 million) of the children preferred cycling or walking and bus. The double of the amount that was for cycling recorded the highest for walking( approximately 12 millions). Likewise, bus usage was 1 million more added to the cycling that is, almost 7 million.

In the year 2010, the least number of the children do cycling(2 millions). However, substantial increase of 1 million added in cycling accounted for walking and bus. Similarly, 2 and 3 millions more in cycling was for bus(5 million) utilization and walking(6 million). The crucial amount to be observed is for the use of car passenger(11 million) that was the highest amount in 2010.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-26 HASAN.511 view
2023-05-08 vuhungbo 73 view
2023-05-08 vuhungbo 79 view
2023-03-15 Areeb Rooman 73 view
2022-11-18 khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh view
Essays by user Surbhi96 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, similarly, as for, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 200.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.925 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58394562636 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8422774986 49.4020404114 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7692307692 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3846153846 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124705061984 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568604282286 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820700126502 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099848487876 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109585738295 0.056905535591 193% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.