The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003-2006.
The given bar graph depicts the proportion of adults of various age groups in the UK using the internet on a daily basis between the years 2003 and 2006. Internet usage is more prominent in the age group of 16-24 years.
From the graph, it can be clearly inferred that the use of the internet in the years 2003 and 2004 remained constant i.e., 80% for the age group of 16-24 years. A significant rise to 100% was observed in the same population. However, a slight drop to 90% was seen by the next year. A successive rise in internet usage was depicted in these consecutive years for the age group of 25-44 years. A similar incremental trend was noted in the usage of the internet for the category of 45-54 years.
Additionally, while comparing the young population, the older population used less internet every day in the following years, and similarly, with the further age increase (65+ years) internet usage declined steeply. Surprisingly, no population of 65+ age used the internet in the year 2003.
Overall, with the increase in age, internet usage declined.
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music is the traditional music of a country is more important than international music 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projections till 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the internet every day from 2003 to 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84864864865 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61033513657 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5196991282 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26582982402 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122569940137 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933952380277 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184341927895 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832327169915 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.