The chart below shows the percentage of aldults of different age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the Information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Given is the bar graph compares five age groups in terms of the percentage of people accessing the Internet in Britain in the 2003-2006 period.
In general, the research demonstrates that the younger generation tended to spend more time online than the old groups. Besides, the number of Internet users increased in every age group over the period.
The 16-54 age group has a significant number of Internet users, chiefly the data of group 16-24 occupied 100% in 2005. There was a dramatic rise in the 25-54 age group, starting with 50% and 60% respectively, and then reaching 80% together at the end. The data of the 16-24 age group followed a different trend, when remaining at 80% for the first two years, going remarkably by 20% and decreasing slightly to 90%.
According to the leftover figures, there are two older age groups, divided into 55 to 64 and more than 65 years old. The figure for the 55-64 age group doubled that for another group, but it was by half when compared to the young. The most dominant data was for the 55-64 age group with approximately 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The best way to solve the environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
- In the future the main reason for going to the shopping mall will be for entertainment not to shop To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort Summarize the infomation by selecting and repeating the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is negative or positive development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, then, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74074074074 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44586412884 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7067988317 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924747654553 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045620435182 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395029019387 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705716128891 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435567385844 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.