The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare a nation in terms of how inhabitants allocated their time to do distinct activities over a period of 50 years from 1958 to 2008.
It is clear from the chart that residents were prone to spare time for working. Additionally, an increased trend was witnessed in all categories, except the figures for going out, other and commuting to work.
In 1958, the proportion of working accounted for the largest percentage, at 33% of the total, compared to 32% and 19% of time spent on going to offices and hanging out in turn. Conversely, local citizens decided to allocate 8% of their time to unwind at home, whereas the rate of other was dwarfed by that of relaxing, at 6%. By contrast, the equivalent figure for sleeping was 3 times as low as that of other.
To 2008, the percentage of working underwent an insignificant growth to 42% and remained the most common activity that local people prioritised to do. At the same time, those of unwinding at home and going to work matched with a roughly similar trend to 13% and 8% respectively, followed by a slow drop to 25% in the share of sleeping. Likewise, the proportion of going out declined substantially to 6%, at which point it shared a comparable figure with that of other, which remained stable over the research period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes Instead they get news about the world from the Internet Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting and they are best at Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
..., compared to 32% and 19% of time spent on going to offices and hanging out in turn. Con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68859649123 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74151577438 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6265774109 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101382501757 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472588211873 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523350348822 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705272404151 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359045936479 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
..., compared to 32% and 19% of time spent on going to offices and hanging out in turn. Con...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68859649123 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74151577438 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6265774109 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101382501757 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472588211873 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523350348822 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705272404151 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359045936479 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.