The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate how employed people spent their time on a variety of activities between 1958 and 2005, in a particular country.
Overall, working adults in this particular country spent most of the time in day for working in 1958, while the figure for travelling to work was the lowest position in the same period. After 50 years, the relationship between working and sleeping witnessed a significant change.
In 1958, most adult used the time in day at work, at around 33%, followed by sleeping with 32%. Moreover, going out was recorded at 19%, twice as much as those who used time for relaxing at home with family. Besides, travelling at work was the activity that took up the least percentage of time spent in a day.
In 2008, the average percentage of working section increased slightly from 33% to 42%, while sleeping saw a downward trend in this period, just 25%. Less time was spent going out with family and friends, but more time was allocated to relaxing at home. Finally, more people spent time for travelling at home and other the percentage of those who used their time for hobbies remained unchanged after a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plan below show a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77386934673 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44629185293 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7129280697 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168585636483 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876788597118 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668159397045 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12660371011 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041847873132 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.