The chart below shows the percentage of a drug company's total sales, by region, from 2002 to 2006.
The given chart provides information on the regional sales of a company specializing in medicines during the 4-year surveyed period, from 2002 to 2006.
Overall, the percentage of sales in Asia experienced a substantial rise throughout the years, whereas American medicine sales seemed to be on a downward trend.
In 2002, the total ratio of drug sales in Asia took up the least amount, at only 25%. However, in the next 4 years, this number gradually increased by 15% to finally reach the highest percentage of 40% in 2006.
America emerged in 2002 as the region which had the most potential in medicine sales with a total rate of 41%. This number experienced a steep decrease to hit an all-time low of 27% in 2004 before slightly rising by 2% to achieve an overall percentage of 30% in 2006.
The sales in Europe started in 2002 in the second place in terms of drug sales with the number of 34%. The ratio peaked first place in 2004 at 38% before dropping back slowly by 8% in 2006 to the same number as America's sales percentage.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 87
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 67
- The chart gives information about European people of different age groups who went to the gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 72
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, whereas, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52290601975 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4309727498 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376455393748 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155713471773 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862439954817 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200189920275 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771437826146 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.