The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012.

The line graph compares the proportion of women elected in parliament in 5 different European nations between 2000 and 2012.
In general, it is clear that the period of time from 2000 to 2012 witnessed an upward trend in quantities in female members in parliament in all 5 countries. Especially there was an intersection between Italy and Germany which paved the way for the first ranking of Italy in the later year and Belgium experienced the fastest growth. In 2000, Germany had the highest percentage of female members of parliament at around 34%, followed by Italy, France and Belgium .The figure for UK was the lowest with approximately 4%. Between 2000 and 2004, there was a dramatic increase in the amount of female workers in parliament in both UK and Belgium. The rest of 3 countries including Germany, Italy and France had increased slightly by 1%,5% and 2% respectively. From 2004 to 2008, UK saw a significant rise from 9% in 2004 to 20% in 2008, which doubled over the four-year period. After that period, in Belgium female workers decreased slightly while the rest of 4 countries kept increase. In 2012, Italy surpassed Germany to reach the peak proportion of woman in parliament at under 40% which was highest in any of other countries while there was the same index in both UK and Belgium with approximately 23%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-15 alifdores 84 view
2019-03-07 Mia Nguyen 73 view
2018-06-03 Chi Nguyen 67 view
2018-06-03 Chi Nguyen 67 view
2017-09-27 lethianhthu 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...2012. In general, it is clear that the period of time from 2000 to 2012 witnessed an upward t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...%, followed by Italy, France and Belgium .The figure for UK was the lowest with ap...
^^
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... followed by Italy, France and Belgium .The figure for UK was the lowest with appro...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70070040959 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530701754386 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.98381361 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276194233294 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119370981128 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789385888602 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214787158559 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221724879063 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.