Line graph : Income of four restaurants, January to December
The figure elucidates the number of incomes of several restaurants in a year. At first glance, it is evident that the intake of all restaurant experienced a gradual palpitation over the entire period and is measured in income in thousand dollars.
To begin with, there was a significant oscillation in the number of evening paradise’s intake in which it, initially stood at just below 60 and achieved approximately at 60 in September, and erratically, it uplifted, soaring to just below 200 by the end of the period shown. At first, the spicy fortune has the same pattern as evening paradise between January, which was at 160, and October, which made up at just below 140. Afterwards, it plummeted tremendously to just above 40 over the following 2 months.
In accordance with the other restaurants, January to June witnessed a remarkable fluctuation in the total revenue of grand fiesta restaurant in which it upright positioned at 100 in January and terminated to just beneath 140 in December. Furthermore, the income of delicacy has the same pattern as the grand fiesta from January, which constituted at just across 20, to December, which accounted for 120.
- Bar Chart : the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 73
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 78
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich, do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ire period and is measured in income in thousand dollars. To begin with, there was a ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07772020725 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03242076898 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5687499477 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0752689955729 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420728028177 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439474139286 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630187100949 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466050597533 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.