The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the rate of households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales between the years 1918 and 2011. The rate is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that during the years the rented houses’ rate has decreased whereas the owned accommodations remained at rising quantity.
At the beginning, in the year 1918 the people that owned accommodation was approximately 22% in contrast with the rented ones that was somehow 77%. Over the next years the households in owned accommodation increased which had a high percentage of 50% in the year 1971. On the other hand the ones in rented houses dropped slowly to also reach the same rate (50%) in 1971. The family that rented homes had a higher rate than the ones that owned them between to the years 1918 and 1971.
However, after the year 1971 there was a noticeable difference where the percentage of the owned and rented switched in rate. In other words, from 1971 until 1981 the rate expanded by 10% (50% to 60%) in owning accommodations in contrast with the rented houses that decreased by also 10% (50% to 40%). This change that occurred had remained throughout the years until 2011 in which households owning homes had growth in rate from 60% till 79% somehow (in 2001) and dropped to approximately 65% in 2011, in opposite to the rented houses that lessened step by step from 50% till about 32% (in 2001) and raised by around 3% (35%) in 2011.
In conclusion, the percentage of families that owned a house was higher in rate after the year 1971 and this had increased gradually till the year 2011. Considering the rented accommodation by households this rate dropped in the same years of having a high percentage in owned ones. Overall, we can say that owned homes remained higher in amount than rented ones in the early year (2011).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the ma 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings but many of them lead unhappy lives Do you agree To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 319.0 196.424390244 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75548589342 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61123069861 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388714733542 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1455536578 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221888274921 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113790042458 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913521041223 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17306461433 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427118006856 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.