The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The given bar chart well compares information about the percentage of teacher gender in different types of educational in UK in 2010. The 6 mentioned educational types include nursery or pre-school, primary-school, collage, private training institute, and university. Overall, it is evident that the percentage of gender teacher in nursery was similar to that of primary school and that of secondary school, collage, and private training institute were similarly. While, that of university was totally different.
In detail, it can be explained that the percentage of male and female teacher in nursery and primary school were were very different; the percentage of male and female in nursery and primary school was similar,or about at 5% and 95% respectively. In the meantime, the percentage of male and female teacher in secondary, collage, and private training institute were almost equal. or at about 50% of both.
Finally, it is interesting that the percentage of male and female teachers in university was different because that had percentage of male higher than female teachers, or at about 70% and 30% respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | quynhthi2001 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | koinoyokan | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Nguyen My | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
- percentage of free-time spent with family form 1950 to 2000 67
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012. 56
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 73
- The Graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in anEnglish town in 2012 67
- the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... collage, and private training institute were similarly. While, that of universit...
^^
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ate training institute were similarly. While, that of university was totally differe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: were
...e teacher in nursery and primary school were were very different; the percentage of male ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...cher in nursery and primary school were were very different; the percentage of male ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...n nursery and primary school was similar,or about at 5% and 95% respectively. In th...
^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...e training institute were almost equal. or at about 50% of both. Finally, it is i...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, or at about 70% and 30% respectively
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, similarly, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3615819209 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01752041821 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2073337164 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310235377731 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141004014565 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125382181319 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225826216269 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255216902142 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.