percentage of free-time spent with family form 1950 to 2000
The graph display the number of leisure time spending with family in four countries including Thailand, the UK, Laos and Australia, measured in percentage over a period of fifty years. Overall it can be seen that these countries spent less leisure time with their family that declined gradually throughout the period.
As far as the UK concerned, the number of leisure time spending declined slightly from 95% to 90% in the first ten years, but the stabilized between 1960 and 1980. There was a moderate dip by 20% and reached 90% again at the end of period.By contrast,In Thailand there was starting in the same point of the UK and decreased slightly to 80% in the next ten years. there was remain unchanged between 1960 and 1970, after that there was a significant fall to 50% in 2000.
Moving to the second part of the number of spending time in Australia, There was a modest growth from 55% in 1950 to 60% in 1960 and steeply fell to 30% in 1970. At the next thirty years, the trend was a minor go down. As similar as Laos concerned, the amount of spending time plunged from 75% to 10% over the period.
- percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
- The Graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in anEnglish town in 2012 67
- the following diagram shows the percentage of each region s male and female population aged over fifteen who can read and write 84
- the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'displays'.
Suggestion: displays
The graph display the number of leisure time spending wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... reached 90% again at the end of period.By contrast,In Thailand there was starting...
^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...% again at the end of period.By contrast,In Thailand there was starting in the same...
^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... slightly to 80% in the next ten years. there was remain unchanged between 1960 and 1...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...to 80% in the next ten years. there was remain unchanged between 1960 and 1970, after ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51741293532 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38178071706 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1564987017 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172116472809 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744114381788 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696544062183 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12022547114 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872238440459 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.