The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The bar chart gives information about the male and female tutors' ratio in six distinct types of educational institutions in the UK in 2010.
Overall, female teachers were greater in number than the male teachers in junior levels of educational institutes. However, in higher education level, there were more male teachers than that of women teachers. In private training institutes, colleges and secondary schools, the ratio of teachers from both genders were quite similar.
According to the given illustration, there was a significant dissimilarity between the number of men and women educators in Nursery/Pre-school levels as well as primary schools. There were almost 98% and 96% female teachers in these two levels which show that the dominance of female teachers in early education level.
In the case of colleges, there was 50 percent male teachers and 50 percent of female teachers which show the equal number of teachers from both genders. In secondary level, the ratio of male teachers (about 47%) was slightly higher than that of female teachers (about 43%). Female teachers' ration in private training institutes was higher than that of male teachers - about 47% female teachers against 43% male teachers. The male teachers in secondary schools were correlative to the female teachers of the private training institutions. In University level, there were 40% more male teachers than the women teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view |
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Topic The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
- Topic The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000 2005 and 2010 The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting th 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...s information about the male and female tutors ratio in six distinct types of educatio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: greater
... 2010. Overall, female teachers were greater in number than the male teachers in junior levels...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re correlative to the female teachers of the private training institutions. In Un...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34977578475 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78330582126 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421524663677 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.281690827 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337163159408 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165321327583 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899531703444 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238896874347 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081324594987 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...s information about the male and female tutors ratio in six distinct types of educatio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: greater
... 2010. Overall, female teachers were greater in number than the male teachers in junior levels...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re correlative to the female teachers of the private training institutions. In Un...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34977578475 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78330582126 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421524663677 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.281690827 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337163159408 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165321327583 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899531703444 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238896874347 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081324594987 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.