Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the era of cutting edge technology, both adults and children make use of portable devices on a daily basis, even becoming an indispensable part in their life. It is argued that children should be prohibited from using their phones in school time while some believe that they can utilize their devices. From my perspective, I contend that students should be limited time - using their smartphones instead of entirely prohibited.
One major ground behind the rising support of banning to use phones among children during school day is that this might become key factor to distract children from learning. Indeed, even adults cannot pay their attention in two tasks at the same time, thus obviously students are easily distracted from listening lessons if they use their phones in the classroom without permission. According to recent reports, the main purpose of using advanced technology among kids is surfing on the Internet as well as getting access to social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok. With vivid inforgraphic, trendy reels, those easily grab students' attention, indirectly interrupting children from studying. Furthermore, going to school not only serves for study purposes but also a good approach for students to have strike up friendships, learn how to interact with other people. Therefore, if children use too much advanced phones at school, they will miss valuable opportunity to enhance their communication skills.
Nevertheless, bring phones to school is also beneficial in certain aspects that people should take into consideration. Firstly, it is a powerful mean for students during learning process at school. This is because these days, both teachers and educators incentize students to work in groups so that they can comfortably express novel ideas, be creative to develop their thoughts and make presentations by using powerpoint or graphic designs thanks to their phones. In addition, if educators integrate technology lessons into rigid traditional courses, this will facilitate children in both knowledge and transferable skills, thus is likely to keep up with the latest modern developments.
In conclusion, bring state-of-the-art devices to school is pros and cons. This probably obstacles children from learning as well as becomes a primry factor that prevent them from interacting face-to-face with other people. However, this is likely to be a powerful tool serving study purposes if educators guide students use their phones wisely. Therefore, adults should limit time to use their phones to protect their health instead of totally prohibited.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 73
- The chart shows the number of people working in 4 sports sectors in an Australian town in 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...raphic, trendy reels, those easily grab students attention, indirectly interrupting chil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4888337469 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83774363575 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575682382134 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7942479412 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.117647059 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439168503333 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143398838027 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106963433386 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292552870948 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080916347483 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.