Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
With the prospect of cutting-edge technology, the economy has experienced a tremendous upward trend than ever before. Advanced devices have become a magical tool allowing companies utilize to raise brand awareness through vivid advertisements. In fact, this approach might make customers bother, and there is no use to grab their attention when browsing. From my perspective, I partly agree with this idea.
It is true that somehow advertisements are of little help to consumers in choosing products. To begin with, it is apparent that such advertisements frequently are ridiculous, nonsensical, or even overdone in terms of products’ functions. That is why a vast majority of customers are letdown and desperately disappointed after a long time using their items. Moreover, some advertisements provide fake information regardless of the unknown origin of the ingredients, leading to serious side effects for users. For example, the media has revealed many instances of fake skincare products like lipsticks, and moist creams, which have a negative impact on their skin. In contrast, people are more likely to have confidence in advice as well as an introduction through friends, and family in order to purchase merchandise.
Nonetheless, somehow, purchasers may be influenced by attractive advertisements. Firstly, it cannot deny that every advertisement has its own distinctive, and become more and more unique and exotic characteristics that suit different buyer groups. This is because analysts have conducted thorough market research before creating a hype. Accordingly, buyers are conducive to being attention-grabbing, saving in their memory, thereby spending money to purchase products when going shopping at stores. Secondly, with the purpose of making the advertisements go viral, creators might corporate with well-known celebrities, known as KOLs, such as bloggers, YouTubers, and particularly singers so as to allure audiences to browse their items.
In conclusion, although some commercials may make less impact on users to make the decision to buy goods, we cannot have full awareness of the power of advertising. It should not be underestimated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | vutamdan | 67 | view |
- The charts show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 84
- Topic Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Topic Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Topic The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... make customers bother, and there is no use to grab their attention when browsing. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rs, YouTubers, and particularly singers so as to allure audiences to browse their items....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6717791411 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30276374186 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668711656442 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6863309468 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.764705882 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2941176471 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102869779453 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305106142869 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253871262292 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555522255831 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193591839169 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.