The chart below shows the percentage of young people taking part in different outdoor sports from 1975 to the present day in the South West of England Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of young people taking part in different outdoor sports from 1975 to the present day in the South West of England.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares different outdoor sports in term of the number of participants from 1975 to current time in the South West of England.

It is clear that there has been a significant change in the rate of young people taking part in various sports. The number of participants in jogging or running and swimming has increased in comparison with this in ball games and biking or roller skating.

As can be seen from the chart, in 1975, 34% of young people chose ball games to play. This proportion of people remained stable for 10 years, then dramatically decreased to approximately 20% in 2000 and has not changed considerably to the present day. Also, there has been a decrease of about 9% in the percentage of people who ride bikes and roller skate, from 25% to approximately 16%.

However, there is a steady rise in the rate of people who go swimming. It remained the same proportion of 15% in the first period, gradually increased from 1980 to 2000 and then striking go up to 35% in current time. Although jogging and running is the sport with the lowest rate of chosen, it has gradually grown over the past 30 years.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-12 nguyenanhduc 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to ball'
Suggestion: to ball
...art, in 1975, 34% of young people chose ball games to play. This proportion of peopl...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63861386139 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58664669095 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9635786616 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224597429709 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875562856791 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697160968282 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13762321297 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715014382309 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.