The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The line chart illustrates the cost of 800 grams of four different kinds of bread in a particular European nation over five consecutive years, starting from 2001.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the prices of Brown, White and Rye bread increased, while the value of Wholegrain bread witnessed a wild fluctuation over the period shown. Additionally, the figure for Brown bread experienced the biggest change.
On the first year of the period, residents in this country had to pay 0.8 euros to own 800 grams of Wholegrain Bread and this was the most expensive bread, while the other types only cost 0.6 euros each. In 2002, the price of Rye bread decreased slightly to 0.5 euros for every 800 grams, the opposite was true for Brown, White and Wholegrain bread, at 1.5 euros, 1 euro and 1.8 euros respectively.
From 2002 to 2005, the value of Wholegrain bread saw a terrible dip hit the lowest point of 0.7 euros in 2004 and came back to the original price in the next year. By contrast, the figures for Brown and White bread both rose to 1.6 euros and 1.3 euros sequentially, although the cost of Brown bread fell to 1.4 euros in 2004. Besides, the price of Rye bread also climbed but not much, at 0.7 euros in 2005.
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 56
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 78
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 95
- The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59009009009 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43345407307 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2174160136 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336710242445 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154043094414 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717834495151 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211163861454 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759409595987 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.