The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006.
The given line chart illustrates the price of 800 grams various kinds of bread: wholegrain, brown, white and rye in European country from the year 2001 to 2006.
It is obvious in the graph that, the money of whole grain experienced for the most impressive data in 2002 as well as dropped significantly in the years later. The price of other kinds of bread: brown, white, rye was the same in the year 2001 and continued increasing quickly in five years.
Between 2001 and 2002, the price of whole grain, brown and white bread soared noticeably to 1.8, 1.5 and 1 euro respectively. As the highest price in this time was hit by the wholegrain. In contrast, there was a slight decrease in the data about rye.
Four years later witnessed a various differences between the price of four kinds. The money of whole grain bread plummet remarkably by one euro ( from 1.8 to 0.8 ). Meanwhile, another types had a upward trend. From 2002 to 2005, the price of white bread increased gradually to over 1.2 euro and also there was a slight increase in the figure about rye breads. The money of brown breads fluctuated in the late period. From 2002 to 2003, the price of them expressed a small rise, while it dropped by 0.2 euro one year later and in 2005 the price was 1.6 euro and reached the highest point at that time.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The graph below shows how people buy music 78
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 73
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 61
- Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer so people tend to go to the stores in the towns and cities and the lead to their inconvenient life Car use also causes pollution Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly to 1.8, 1.5 and 1 euro respectively. As the highest price in this time was hit ...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'difference'?
Suggestion: difference
... Four years later witnessed a various differences between the price of four kinds. The mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain bread plummet remarkably by one euro from 1.8 to 0.8 . Meanwhile, another typ...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... remarkably by one euro from 1.8 to 0.8 . Meanwhile, another types had a upward t...
^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...8 to 0.8 . Meanwhile, another types had a upward trend. From 2002 to 2005, the pr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5358649789 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33464147324 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.568050564 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5833333333 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337709010608 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120884707098 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10337240322 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216437161598 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126384682712 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.