The chart below shows the proportion of people who ate at least five portions of Fruit and Vegetables per day in Canada from 2001 to 2010.
The given bar graph provides the information about the percentage of males, females and children, who ate fruits and vegetables at least five portions by Canadian Citizen in a decade.
Taking a general overview, it is apparent that the percentage of the women who had fruits and vegetables showed an upward trend. While, children had the minimum proportion, which was almost under 20.
It can be clearly seen that females had the highest percentage of eating fruits and vegetables in 2006 followed by the same gender in 2007, it was around 33%. The lowest proportion was noticed in 2001. Although, as regards males, in 2001, 2002 and 2003, it was recorded almost similar with approximately 23% and then it stood at around 26% in 2006 and 2007 Both years.
Turning to the next information, regarding percentage of children, as compared to the year in 2006, 2% more fruits and vegetables were ate in 2007. Whereas, from 2001 to 2004, it displayed a marginal difference. Apart from this, the proportion was 17%, 20% and 18% in 2005, 2006 and 2008 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-15 | Guri473812 | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows information about the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004
- The chart below shows the proportion of people who ate at least five portions of Fruit and Vegetables per day in Canada from 2001 to 2010 84
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children s who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults 56
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...006, 2% more fruits and vegetables were ate in 2007. Whereas, from 2001 to 2004, it...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, whereas, while, apart from, as regards, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92777777778 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69518890059 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2902745621 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2433289777 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988408793011 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670399666634 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151373810492 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624139213174 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.