In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this? What solution can you suggest?
In modern scenario, it is argued that many educational sectors like schools face a number of barriers because of no serious behavior of learners. I will discuss about the few reasons of this phenomeon and give some suggestions to solve these problems in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there can immense be causes which show that why most of the students follow bad behavior in their schools. The primary fact is that majority of students are not serious regarding their study in their lives. As they have a lack of interest in the study and no logically activities are happened by them while their school time. Owing to this, they do not only disturb other students but also teachers face many problems to teach others. For example, many learners do not able to concentrate on their study in order to get higher marks in the class because of bad behavior of few students. Thus, this vogue has negative effects for other pupils as well as school environment.
On the other hand, there can be manifold ways which help to solve these bottlenecks for making a good condition of schools. The key suggestion is that in this term, educational departments should form interesting curriculum of study for students. As through this way, it will encourage them to participate in every study activities with their interest. Due to this, they will help of students and staff members of schools in order to making better environment. For instance, a survey was conducted by the Delhi University last year, which demonstrated that most of the schools which have lot of different ways of study, they have better environment and results of students as compared to other schools. Hence, interesting ways of studying play a crucial role in schools.
To recapitulate, undoubtedly, there are many students, who are unconscious for their study and create many problems for their schools. Whoever, these barriers can be solved by different interesting ways of study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-05 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Guri473812 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-23 | kaylin nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-23 | kaylin nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | ismailyusanto226 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the proportion of people who ate at least five portions of Fruit and Vegetables per day in Canada from 2001 to 2010 84
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods Give your own opinion and examples 73
- We live today in electronic information age It is easier to be connected by thechnology Yet many people seem no closer to feeling happy in their lives Discuss 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whoever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...create many problems for their schools. Whoever, these barriers can be solved by differ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00305810398 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68910474139 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.269551784 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180578369901 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653602272705 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356595624628 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115796832298 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327932018505 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.