the chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the result of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

The bar chart features coffee and tea beverage consumption habits in five cities in Australia over the course of last four weeks. Overall, more than half the population in all cities with an exception of Adelaide went to cafes for coffee or tea, whilst instant coffee purchase was also well favored and buying fresh coffee is generally the least common option.

Predominantly, going to cafes was the preferred choice for Melbourne and Hobart with 64% and 63% respectively, which then followed by Sydney at just over 60% and Brisbane at over 55% in opposition to Adelaide with the least trend of under 50%. However, the only city that had the higher purchase figure of instant coffee compared to others was Adelaide with slightly over 50%. Moreover, Hobart hold the most instant coffee purchases with 2% higher ahead of Brisbane at 52%, followed by Melbourne at 48% and just faintly over 45% by Sydney.

Concisely, stocking up on fresh coffee was below 45% for all cities. It was most common in Sydney at 44% and Melbourne with 2% less of difference. Whereas Hobart was next at 39%, Adelaide and Brisbane had nearly mutual figures of just around 34%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-13 soomi2209 73 view
2024-04-13 soomi2209 67 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 73 view
2023-12-17 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user afidahlia :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Hobart) must be used with a third-person verb: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...ith slightly over 50%. Moreover, Hobart hold the most instant coffee purchases with ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87817258883 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42253797747 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4023615181 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135528535299 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717413662592 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814217888556 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110575825651 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10213218511 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.