The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates statistics on coffee and tea consumption by people living in five different cities in Australia, namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.
Overall, in the last four weeks, people prefered to go to a cafe for coffee or tea, rather than buying fresh or instant coffee in the all mentioned cities except Adelaide. Moreover, in all five cities instant coffee was more popular than fresh alternatives.
In Sydney and Melbourne, the survey results show a similar trend. While in both cities around 60% of city residents had a cup of coffee or tea in a cafe, approximately 40-45% of people bought fresh coffee and about 45-50% prefered an instant version of the drink. 60% of Hobart residents preferred going to a cafe as well, but more people consumed instant coffee (close to 55%) and less people bought fresh drink (under 40%), than in Sydney and Melbourne.
Drinking habits in Brisbane and Adelaide had a certain amount of resemblance too. Residents of these cities drank only close to 35% of fresh coffee. There were just minor differences in the trends of buying fresh coffee and going out for a cup of this drink: in Brisbane those numbers were around 50-55% and in Adelaide - close to 50%.
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
- A staggering amount of food is wasted every year both in businesses and households Why is this happening What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- The tables below give information about fossil fuel and electricity use in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of Earth What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...onsumed instant coffee close to 55% and less people bought fresh drink under 40%, th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...55% and in Adelaide - close to 50%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93779904306 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52274910337 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2344050948 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231332671612 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106223669005 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439511481527 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146796055311 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359848610681 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.