The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparasions where relevant.
The given info-graph illustrates data about preferences of Australian citizens in terms of purchasing and consuming liquids such as coffee and tea and their drinking habits. The test was observed in five cities during a month and figures are shown in percentages.
According to the chart, all figures collide with fluctuations but the highest portions belong to the part “visiting café on the purpose of buying tea or coffee” in almost all learnt cities except from Adelaide. Small amount of people prefer to have fresh coffees and their quantities were 44, 42, 33, 34, 36 percent in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart respectively. Following amounts represents the fence of inhabitants to the instant coffees. People from Brisbane and Hobart bought more while percentages of Melbourne and Adelaide were slightly less from first couple, their differences were in 2 percent from one another when Sydney’s amount was smallest and showed around 45%. Surprisingly, habitants of Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart showed almost the same interests going to café to buy coffee or tea, their quantities were around 64%, 63% and slightly more than 60 % each.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasions where relevant 78
- In your opinion what has been the most significant transportation innovation of the past 200 years 56
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 56
- Some people believe that children that commit crime should be punished Others think that parents should be punished instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37158469945 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76990561692 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4370698845 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163815352001 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715486150557 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446645168301 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133558246252 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017503920505 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.