the chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates three different approaches by which people living in 5 various Australian territories could have their coffee or tea. Clearly, the approaches in specified 4 weeks timescale were buying fresh coffee, having an instant kind and going to café. In addition, chosen cities were Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart.
Overall, the most preferable approach was relatively going to café. Moreover, the second highest-rated habit was buying instant coffee and eventually having a fresh café allocated the lowest contribution to total population selections in all cities.
To begin with, the high-rated approach which was going to café had different fluctuated amounts in 5 mentioned cities that the highest percentage was for both Malborne and Hobart by 63% approximately. Alternatively, this percentage deteriorated drastically reaching around 50% in Adelaide. The second and third highest share were for Sydney and Brisbane by 61% and 56%, respectively.
Buying fresh coffee was the lowest share in all cities which Brimstone and Adelaide percentage was equal plateau at 34% and a sharp soar about 10% in this category was for Sydney that reached 44%. Despite an approachable option as buying instant coffee being available, it was not mostly picked as the most rated option in all cities and the percentage was fluctuating around 50% and transparently the highest rang was for Hobart by 54%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue some people think this money should not be invested this much To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 67
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided bar chart illustrates three...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. Overall, the most preferable approach wa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...population selections in all cities. To begin with, the high-rated approach w...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isbane by 61% and 56%, respectively. Buying fresh coffee was the lowest share...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, so, third, as for, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4932735426 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91176109451 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0739870694 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994468276974 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041909735347 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385276600911 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668820093733 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314676842519 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.