The given pie chart gives data about the proportion of visitors in four separate elements of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999.
As is observed, Theme Park made up the biggest segment of the chart and included many interesting places while Wildlife Parks and Zoos had the least percentage of visitors.
In 1999, it is clear that Theme Parks was the place that attracted the majority of visitors with 38%, which contributed the largest part. In the second place, Museums and Galleries also had a huge number of tourists, just 1% under the Theme Parks. There was just 16% for the Historic Houses and Monuments and the smallest, only 9% for Wildlife Parks and Zoos.
There were five impressive places in Theme Parks and almost all tourists chose to visit Blackpool Pleasure Beach, which was 47%. Alton Towers and Pleasureland, Southport gravitated approximately the same percentages of guest, about 17% and 16%. During the same period, Chessington World of adventures and Legoland, Wisdsor witnessed identical proportion with 10% of visitors.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 92
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for aging individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17058823529 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63952522731 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652941176471 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.8377115118 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117789426854 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526056332069 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807349034583 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898175462435 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939335461122 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.