The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two presented pie charts give data about the changes in the proportion of eight different sectors of the economy in Turkey over a period of 16 years, from 2000 to 2016.

As is observed, agriculture made up the biggest part of the chart while construction was the smallest segment in 2000. In comparison, by 2016, healthcare and education was the most significant part of the economy, whereas the lowest contribution was made by finance, business and others.

Construction was only a tiny fraction which was just 3% in 2000, then underwent a more than threefold rise to 10% in 2016. There was also a slight increase in manufacturing when it came from 8% to 12% in the timeframe of 16 years. Trade, utilities, and transportation witnessed a fractional growth of 2% since 14% in 2000. During the period, the finance, business and other services segment rose from 5% to 8%.

Within a time span of 16 years, the sector that made the highest contribution in 2000, which is agriculture, declined sharply and went from 24% to 14% in 2016. Government and leisure and hospitality occupied 12% and 17% of the economy of Turkey in 2000, then had a downward tendency and dropped to 9% and 14% at the end of the period. Healthcare and education was the only component that could remain stable during 16 years, which is 17%.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76086956522 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78684799355 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8951364186 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160611507183 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640224458169 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643227515385 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115826949385 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668816928992 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.